This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Newspapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Newspapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NewspapersWikipedia:WikiProject NewspapersTemplate:WikiProject NewspapersNewspapers articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oregon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oregon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OregonWikipedia:WikiProject OregonTemplate:WikiProject OregonOregon articles
The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.
Israel Bayer (talk·contribs) has been paid by Street Roots. Their editing has included contributions to this article.
Street Roots (talk·contribs) has been paid by Street Roots. Their editing has included contributions to this article.
@Peteforsyth:, would you object to rephrasing "Leadership of both Street Roots and SAFE disavowed any editorial influence connected with the grant, focusing on the two organizations' shared commitment to "providing a service for the homeless." into reading "Exceutive director of Street Roots disavowed any editorial influence connected with the grant. Two organizations share commitment to "providing a service for the homeless." ? Unless I missed something, I am not seeing anything in the Willamette Week article indicating SAFE leadership took any position on the editorial matter. Graywalls (talk) 15:25, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I phrased it that way due to this paragraph in the WW article:
Chisek, a non-voting member of the SAFE committee, says moderating Street Roots ’ editorial stance wasn’t a consideration. “Understandably, it seems like it would be an awkward position for Street Roots ,” Chisek says. However, he adds, the committee and Street Roots shared a common purpose: providing a service for the homeless.
