Talk:Storage Networking Industry Association

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Merger proposal[edit]

I propose that SNIA Technical Work Groups be merged into Storage Networking Industry Association. I think that the technical work groups can easily be explained in the context of of the SNIA, and the Storage Networking Industry Association article is of a reasonable size that the merging of SNIA Technical Work Groups will not cause any problems as far as article size or undue weight is concerned. Furthermore, merging will help alleviate the notability problem on the SNIA Technical Work Groups page. – voidxor (talk | contrib) 01:32, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, very overdue. Thanks W Nowicki (talk) 20:45, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. I took the liberty of removing the material that had been tagged as uncited for over a year. – voidxor 23:07, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@W Nowicki: Would you like me to do the same for your proposed merge at SNIA Security TWG as well? I had seen that page but didn't want to nominate it until my proposed merger was settled. I strongly agree that it should be merged too. – voidxor 23:14, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Sure, that would be a great step. Another one is SNIA Conformance Testing Program which just has one link to its self-published page. It seems there should be some mentions in the trade press or something one could add to beef this article up, perhaps making it more historical narrative instead of a simple definition. The group has been around long enough, so does have staying power. Thanks for any help. W Nowicki (talk) 20:24, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Done with SNIA Security TWG. I'll take a look at SNIA Conformance Testing Program tomorrow, and consider doing the same for it. – voidxor 05:01, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Done with SNIA Conformance Testing Program. @W Nowicki: I discovered another article: SNIA Dictionary. It too is unreferenced, and seems even less notable than those we've already merged. Should I merge it as well? – voidxor 22:34, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Done the dictionary one was fairly trivial too, so I went ahead and took the liberty myself. Thanks, keep up the good work @Voidxor:. W Nowicki (talk) 20:57, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Article not notable on its own merits, promotional in nature Rogermx (talk) 15:15, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  checkY Merger complete. Klbrain (talk) 18:44, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]