Talk:Stonecutter (disambiguation)

This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.DisambiguationWikipedia:WikiProject DisambiguationTemplate:WikiProject DisambiguationDisambiguation articles

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Andrewa (talk) 21:19, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Stonecutter → Stonecutter (disambiguation) – Having just fixed incoming links to this term, it is clear that the primary topic of this term by historical significance is stonemasonry. Move the page to redirect this title there. bd2412 T 15:58, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Weak oppose I'm wondering on the extent that quarry workers and stone cutting machines may also fit the description. Here's a Google image search. There are a lot of products by name of stone cutter clearly used for cutting stone though. There are also results for: Gem stone cutter but they did not get as far as Google images. However, in general, stone cutter seems less directed to me than stone mason. Gregkaye ✍♪ 17:22, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

To a degree, stonemasonry covers the use of modern machinery for stone cutting. However, my concern is not with what exists out on the Internet, but what exists as articles on this disambiguation page. Nothing on the page as it stands compares in historical importance. bd2412 T 18:08, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support - Definitely the primary topic.--Yaksar (let's chat) 18:36, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support - the machines are secondary. In ictu oculi (talk) 23:56, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support, seems a clear primary topic. older ≠ wiser 14:59, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. Primary topic. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:18, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.