This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 00:12, April 24, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Soviet Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Soviet UnionWikipedia:WikiProject Soviet UnionTemplate:WikiProject Soviet UnionSoviet Union articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cold War, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Cold WarWikipedia:WikiProject Cold WarTemplate:WikiProject Cold WarCold War articles
Is, or was a policy? Territorial changes from Germany to Poland were eventually recognized, correct? 2601:600:8500:5B1:218:E7FF:FE7D:6AFA (talk) 03:00, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
territorial changes by violence were target of Stimson policy. Rjensen (talk) 10:19, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The lead currently says "The Stimson Doctrine is a policy of. . .". Should it be "was"? It's also a policy of the United Nations though so it would make sense for it to also be a US federal policy, but . . . ~ 2601:600:8500:5B1:218:E7FF:FE7D:6AFA (talk) 12:51, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
there are 2 angles: 1) what is the policy: "is" = appropriate 2) it the policy still in effect? that is not at issue. Rjensen (talk) 13:35, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The doctrine represents jus cogens in international law nowadays. Heiko Meiertöns: The Doctrines of US Security Policy – An Evaluation under International Law. Cambridge University Press 2010, ISBN 978-0-521-76648-7, p. 98 --5glogger (talk) 07:34, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
.svg){kind=small}
