This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This page is about an active politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. Because of this, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
Stephanie Peacock is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: no consensus to move the page at this time, per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 18:27, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
OpposeWP:NOPRIMARY per above. Primary topic isn't just about page stats (else we could automate that), but also requires some showing of long-term significance. -- Netoholic@ 22:58, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Support per nom. Of the two people with this name the politician is clearly the primary topic in terms of usage. Neither "international renown" or "long-term significance" (reasons cited in the last discussion) are necessary here. PC78 (talk) 17:24, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per arguments in the previous discussion. All two-person disambiguation pages list one person who has more views than the other person, but if the person with the greater number has no demonstrable international renown or long-term significance, then the higher number of views alone should not be an instant pathway to WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. —Roman Spinner(talk • contribs) 23:46, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
All aspects of each individual nomination are examined on a case-by-case basis. Entries for recently-elected legislators, with no additional claims to notability, are frequently accessed per aptly-named WP:RECENT but, by that standard, all new MPs would advance to primary topics. —Roman Spinner(talk • contribs) 02:47, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
If you're suggesting "recentism" as a factor then that would also have to apply to the swimmer, who has no greater claim to "long-term notability" (or significance, for that matter) than the politician. WP:PRIMARYTOPIC does not set a higher bar for elected officials. PC78 (talk) 03:23, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Recentism is indeed at the heart of the creation of both articles. The swimmer's entry was AfD-nominated and deleted in 2014, but recreated in 2016, following her medal wins. Likewise, the MP's entry along with the dab page was created in 2017, following her election. No one is questioning the long-term notability of either woman since Wikipedia strives to list all MPs and all medalists. Neither Stephanie Peacock, however, has accumulated sufficient international spotlight for advancement to primary over the other one. —Roman Spinner(talk • contribs) 03:59, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. and more notable. Futebul (talk) 23:59, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Over 97% of readers are looking for the politician. The other 3% get to the swimmer as easily through a hatnote as through a dab page. Station1 (talk) 19:35, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Hello Stephanie , my name is Sharron Foley , We need a ramp for our bungalow to be able to go to the shops etc , I have COPD and my partner Allan Stanley has Parkinson’s , we have asked the council but all they say is that it’s not possible , however some neighbours have got ramps , we have steps but so do others with ramps , please help 92.7.179.240 (talk) 14:48, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
.svg){kind=small}