Talk:Steal (poker)

This page was proposed for deletion by CommanderWaterford (talk · contribs) on 2 February 2021.

Gambling: Poker Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Gambling, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Gambling on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GamblingWikipedia:WikiProject GamblingTemplate:WikiProject GamblingGambling articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by WikiProject Poker (assessed as Low-importance).

An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

WikiProject Gambling To-do:

Current collaborations:

Improve an article to FA

Improve an article to A

Help with the Gambling articles needing attention.
Tag the talk pages of Gambling-related articles with the {{WikiProject Gambling}} banner.
The link to the Missouri gambling site is now out of date and needs to be updated.
Japan section reads as though it was written by the gambling industry - quotes of 160% returns are 'citation needed'.

Opening comment[edit]

The article says that stealing can be profitable if the players to ones left are passive. I believe that the correct word here would be tight, not passive. Some passive players call and call and call. Tight players fold.

I posted the above quite awhile ago. You guys don't seem to want to use a meaningful terms, or at least you can't take suggestions. I would change it myself but I don't have time to get involved in editing wars with people who won't even discuss their choices. And I saw what happened to my change below.

I changed "a raise can act as a steal," which was pretty damn meaningless, to "any raise can act as a steal," which was more to the point. Someone changed it back. I won't change it again. you can keep your article pristine, and rather bad, just as you want it. If you don't think my change was an improvement, you could at least say why.

I agree on both counts. Not sure why your earlier edit was reverted without comment. --LDC 06:33, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There was a comment, and it wasn't addressed. The "any raise" comment is silly. Steals are a specific circumstance. A raise on seventh street instud will never be a steal. I'm changing it back to the proper language. 2005 06:47, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good point: "but...a raise" didn't make grammatical sense. "...any" did, but your version is better grammatically and semantically.

Definitely. It makes much more sense than the original or my simple change.

Seventh stret in stud would occur, however, only in rare nine-card stud variations. :-,)65.79.173.135 (talk) 16:16, 25 September 2008 (UTC)Will in New Haven[reply]

Everywhere I've played stud, the "street" terminology refers to the total number of cards given, not the betting round. Thus, the first betting round is called "third street". --LDC (talk) 21:24, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I concur. I've never heard of a "first street." Admiral Norton ^(talk) 16:36, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]