Talk:Stay (Shakespears Sister song)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

== Article name == Shouldn't this article be named "Staaaaaay wiiiiiith meeeehehehe!"? Zyxoas (talk to me - I'll listen) 11:31, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Songwriting bias[edit]

The Songwriting section reads as though the author is trying to make a bitchy point about who had the most important role in the success of the song, rather than providing a neutral point of view description of how it was written.

Ignoring the repeated chorus of "Stay with me", Fahey contributed 59 words and Detroit contributed 71 ( I just counted them ). The tone of the article would have an innocent reader believe that Fahey barely contributed anything.

Three people wrote the song, and two people sang it, and no twisting of words will change that. I doubt it would have been a hit without either singer's contribution.

This kind of heavy handed bias undermines the authority Wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.187.233.172 (talk) 12:51, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Censorship in Germany?[edit]

As far as I know the song was not banned in Germany. I have seen it on MTV a hundred thousand times back in the 1990s. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.196.250.35 (talk) 19:11, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Stay (Shakespears Sister song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 12:00, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Stay (Shakespears Sister song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:10, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]