Talk:Statute of Autonomy
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Requested move 30 April 2024[edit]
It has been proposed in this section that Statute of Autonomy be renamed and moved to Statute of autonomy. A bot will list this discussion on requested moves' current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil. Please use {{subst:requested move}} . Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly. |
Statute of Autonomy → Statute of autonomy – Please place your rationale for the proposed move here. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 09:07, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support per MOS:CAPS, WP:AT. — BarrelProof (talk) 21:41, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support: Yep, looks like it is about the topic of such statutes rather than a specific statute, so not a proper noun and not capitalized on Wikipedia. SchreiberBike | ⌨ 22:29, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment – How about a rationale or some data or something? Dicklyon (talk) 03:45, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Per SchreiberBike, this is about a type of law, not any specific law or the name of a law. It's like declaration of independence (or prime minister or senate). — BarrelProof (talk) 16:56, 1 May 2024 (UTC)