Talk:Statue of Charles Sumner (Cambridge, Massachusetts)
Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sculpture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sculpture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SculptureWikipedia:WikiProject SculptureTemplate:WikiProject Sculpturesculpture articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles
I think the two Sumner statue articles should be merged, the benefit of separate primary geocoords seems small here compared to the extra clarity. Another Believer what do you think? I began to do it as it seemed uncontroversial, but checking as I see you worked on this a while back. Feel free to restore an old v. if you disagree (I realize that presently the (Cambridge) qualifier on this title is inaccurate!) – SJ + 00:07, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I would think the statues are independently notable and we should two separate entries. ---Another Believer(Talk) 03:34, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I agree they are both notable as monumental public art -- they just share a lot of disambiguation overhead :) Separate articles will certainly make it easier to keep Wikidata entries up to date. I would love to find sources that talk about the details of one and not the other. (As I wrote that, I see there's better sourcing and context in Whitney's article...) – SJ + 03:52, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
