This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jazz, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of jazz on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JazzWikipedia:WikiProject JazzTemplate:WikiProject JazzJazz articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject R&B and Soul Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of R&B and Soul Music articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.R&B and Soul MusicWikipedia:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicTemplate:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicR&B and Soul Music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Record Labels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of record labels on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Record LabelsWikipedia:WikiProject Record LabelsTemplate:WikiProject Record Labelsrecord labels articles
First of all, not sure that a defunct record label is of any interest to the WikiProject Business unless this particular case exemplifies the vicissitudes of small, independently-run labels in a cut-throat market. But that's not what I came here to bring up. I was thinking that when the list - it's only a short one comprising 64 releases (not much more than 128 songs?) - is more complete, it could be spun off onto a List of recordings issued on States Records, or summat along those lines. Just a thought. --Technopat (talk) 19:26, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
OK, so it wasn't independent but a subsidiary. Above points still stand. --Technopat (talk) 19:46, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
