Talk:Starr sting pain scale

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Merge with Schmidt Sting Pain Index[edit]

This seems to be the same values, so I propose a merge of the two. Widefox 17:22, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In fact, suspiciously so. How (and why) did two different entomologists come up with nearly identical scales, with point values 1 through 4? If one of them knew of the other, then there was no good reason to create the second scale. 70.20.211.100 (talk) 13:33, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Not at all suspicious - they worked together. Widefox (talk) 08:29, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Could they not agree over who got to name it, and resultantly both claimed it? I hope there's a friendlier explanation. -- What does the rest of the entomological community use? -- One of these articles seems perhaps destined to become a footnote in the other. Google results are inconclusive, as both appear to have published more on the topic; however searching the "exact titles" is only getting a couple of hits. -- Quiddity (talk) 01:00, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Starr sting pain scale. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 18:57, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]