Talk:Star Wars: Empire at War: Forces of Corruption

Plot Summary

The plot summary is very difficult to read and understand, with a number of unfinished sentences. I haven't played the game - can someone who knows the story rewrite the plot summary so it makes sense? Demosthenes X 03:58, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

Plot Summary2

There is a part in the plot summary which states quote "They eventually free the witch Silri along with the other Nightsisters (both of whom are sith and have power with the force). This is not true. Dathomiri witches are adept at the dark side of the force but they are not sith. I will make the following amendment: "They eventually free the witch Silri along with the other Nightsisters (both of whom are adept at the dark side of the force)" JackRendar 01:13, 29 January 2010 (UTC–6)

Update!!!

Forces of Corruption is out. Please update this article as necessary.

And the voice of Darth is Chad?

Just read on the YouTube page for blamesociety.net that Matt Sloan, the voice of Chad Vader, is doing Darth Vader in this game. Can anybody confirm this? --Cooleyez229 21:40, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

• He does voice Vader here. It's in the manual. 68.149.168.170 00:00, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

Reception?

Perhaps a critical reception-section would be in order? May I suggest using Gamestats, Gamerankings, Metacritic and Rotten Tomatoes as reference points? --Broadbandmink 15:13, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

Endless Imperial re-enforcements?!?

I managed to destroy the Empire's last Super Star Destroyer, and it says to finish off the remaining Imperial forces, but they never stop coming out of hyperspace, and eventually destroyed all my ships after 2 hours of slaughtering them. What has to be done to win this part of the game? --TodKarlson 11:03, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

This is not a place to ask the question. This page is to discuss changes to the article, not game tips. I suggest you go somewhere like the Gamespy forums, or something. --OuroborosCobra 21:12, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

Wah! I don't understand why there is an article on a video game here in the first place. This seemed to be a good place to get an answer without a bunch of commercials. It's a discussion page. Actually, I did finally manage to fulfill the game's bloodlust for Imperial Star Destroyers, and the game ended abruptly (and rather anti-clamaticaly, suggesting an up-coming sequel expansion pack).

--TodKarlson 16:53, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

Mods

Since the modding Scene for EAW and FoC are pretty large, a mods section would be in order? Ross 14:47, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

Renovation

I've given the article a major rework, including:

• Summarizing the plot
• Mass grammar/spelling/formatting corrections
• Citing
• Correcting content errors
• Creating a development section
• Gathering stats for reviews

TheMoridian 12:30, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

The reviews section needs to have prose as well as the raw scores - why did the expansion get the scores it did? What did the reviewers think about it? -Malkinann (talk) 00:21, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

Assessment as of 2008-09-18

Remaining at start-class. There really needs to be some flesh on the development and reception sections before it can be rated higher.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 00:28, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

Spellings of American-English words

There's a few edits going back and forth regarding the words artifact (or artefact) and centre (or center). While I investigate which is supposed to be used, I am going to change all occurrences to artifact and centre, because these are pretty much already used throughout the article anyway. TheMoridian 16:10, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

Right, the MOS says that either variety can be used providing consistency is maintained throughout the article. So let's stick with artifact and centre. TheMoridian 16:14, 20 October 2008 (UTC)