Talk:Standardization agreement

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

7.62x51mm NATO cartridge[edit]

says NATO used the 762x51 ammo until the 80's. don't we still use this cartridge?? m240, mg3, minigun, etc GarrettJL 09:33, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think it refers to the basic rifle for infantrymen, not including machine guns or designated marksman weapons. Many countries use(d) FN-FAL as their standard infantry rifle. --UnneededAplomb (talk) 01:07, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Classification[edit]

Are some of these documents classified? It would be useful to list which are freely available and which are not. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.126.207.212 (talk) 10:29, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

All STANAGs not published at http://nsa.nato.int are classified. There are however a fair number of civil standards by NSA (NATO Standardisation Agency) in use. -- A Certain White Cat chi? 19:21, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

Page Badly Named[edit]

This page should be called NATO Standardization Agreements as there are many formal and informal Standardization Agreements in the industrial and technical realms -- so the page title itself must specify which one. Eyreland (talk) 18:46, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Standardization Agreement. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:28, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]