Talk:St Paul's Girls' School

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

Why no mention of St. Paul's Suite in this article?

Alumnae[edit]

Did Victoria Coren go to St Paul's? Myopic Bookworm 15:25, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In the article on Carol Thatcher it says that she was at St Paul's, but it originally said "St Paul's Boarding School" and I thought that St Paul's was a day school. Millbanks (talk) 10:08, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There is no uniform[edit]

"There is no uniform (except for sports uniform for the younger years), which encourages individuality within the school community".

The second phrase here seems like an opinion. Is it a quote from school brochure/website? There could be endless discussion and research on whether this statement is true or not. I have no strong opinion either way, but then that's not the point. If this were to changed to "with the [stated] object of encouraging individuality within the school community", if this is true, then that's more like what we expect here; it is an observer's view of the school rather than the school's opinion of itself. And with a reference.

Personally I think there are other, more important, ways of cultivating individuality, and that having no school uniform could be viewed by some as divisive (rich vs. poor, fashion show-offs vs others, etc.), or as unimportant - but that ain't the point I am making, or something to be discussed here! P0mbal (talk) 16:10, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

@P0mbal: I agree with your general approach/assessment; although I guess the 'rich v poor' aspect is probably neutralised by the, err, >24K annual fee per pupil  :) ——Serial 16:05, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notable[edit]

Celia Brayfield appears twice, for some reason. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.41.51.240 (talk) 12:00, 13 April 2009 (UTC) A. Shulman also appears twice, for some reason. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.184.201.103 (talk) 12:51, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thomasina Miers appears twice. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.148.7.40 (talk) 12:40, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Info needed[edit]

The article should say what the denominational basis and the like are. The school seems to have a Protestant basis and to be a day school. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.184.201.103 (talk) 12:35, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on St Paul's Girls' School. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:12, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on St Paul's Girls' School. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:31, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Isabel dos Santos[edit]

In this edit, an IP has added Isabel dos Santos to the list of old girls, with a reference to the not-unreliable but far from neutral website of the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists [1]. Dos Santos' own article doesn't mention SPGS, but says she attended Cobham Hall School, Kent; and she's also listed among the school's alumnae in its dedicated article (albeit in both cases unsourced). She may, of course, have attended both schools. Can anyone sort this out, and make the articles compatible? GrindtXX (talk) 14:01, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That's an odd one. I have found and added two refs which support her attendance at St Paul's. I have also found and added to the Cobham Hall page two refs which support her attendance there. Both those refs relate to the same event (her house purchase) in 2019, so I am wondering whether she did not attend CH, an IP added her attendance in 2017 and both the 2019 articles (Times and Tatler) were working off a source which had picked up the erroneous info from Wikipedia? The sources for St Paul's are more in-depth so I would tend to trust those. Anyway, that is speculation - I have put all four refs on her own article and will post on Talk page there to see if anyone can help. I have also tagged alumni for the St Paul's article as almost none of them have a ref on this page. Tacyarg (talk) 18:17, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

I'm not seeing the advert problem - there are a couple of adjectives, but both seem justified. (Distinguished directors of music and performing extremely well.) What am I missing? Tacyarg (talk) 07:47, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Agree: it's all pretty factual and neutral. Unless someone can point to any specific instances, the tag should be removed. GrindtXX (talk) 16:53, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

some other OPs[edit]

Anna Pasternak, Cressida Cowell, Monica Dickens, Sarah Hobson (travel author of Through Persia in Disguise), Una Kroll - campaigned for women priests, Joy lo Dico (Evening Standard journalist), Catherine Storr, Eleanor Mills, Emma Woolf, Lucy Moss (who wrote Six). And for Imogen Holst, shouldn't it say composer too? 94.197.172.59 (talk) 15:10, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]