This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
St Paul's Church, Peel is part of WikiProject Anglicanism, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to Anglicanism and the Anglican Communion. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AnglicanismWikipedia:WikiProject AnglicanismTemplate:WikiProject AnglicanismAnglicanism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greater Manchester, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greater Manchester on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Greater ManchesterWikipedia:WikiProject Greater ManchesterTemplate:WikiProject Greater ManchesterGreater Manchester articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Historic sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of historic sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Historic sitesWikipedia:WikiProject Historic sitesTemplate:WikiProject Historic sitesHistoric sites articles
Anyone who visits may be stuck by the vastness of the churchyard. There is a quite novel arrangement of memorials, along the pathway that runs around the south of the church, in a kind if (very cramped) terrace arrangement. I have personally not seen this anywhere else, but it may be quite common at other churchyards in this area. The main path from the entrance at the north of the churchyard incorporates a number of entire inscribed gravestones laid crossways, although I have seen this in a few other churchyards. Sadly the south-west gate to the churchyard is now entirely nissing. To the south-east of the church (near the rear of Morrisons supermarket) is a subtsnatial stone-bulit outbuilding, presumably used in churchyard maintenance, which is an unusual feature. I can't find any of these details mentioned in any WP:RS, however, so I guess they cannot be added. I suppose we should be grateful that such a large inner-city church is still in use at all. Martinevans123 (talk) 15:26, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The "{Infobox church}" template includes parameters for, amongst other things, construction cost and clergy. Should these be added, if there is reliable information readily available? Or can they be simply ignored if they are considered to be "too messy" and/or require "high maintenance"? Many other church articles seem to use them. So how does one decide when they are and are not appropriate? Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 22:32, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Common sense will hopefully prevail but I am not holding my breath.J3Mrs (talk) 13:00, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I had not realised how huge the complete church info box template was. I think the approach you have adopted here is perfectly reasonble and in line with common sense. But then I sometimes think that tne name of the vicar can be one of the most useful items in a church info box. I guess it all depends on what the reader is looking for when they come to the article. Martinevans123 (talk) 13:42, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
