Talk:St Paul's Cathedral, Melbourne

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Height[edit]

Does anyone know the height of the cathedral's tallest spire?Wai Hong 14:30, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Possible new external link[edit]

Hi, I moderate Culture Victoria. We have the St Paul's Cathedral story in CV which includes historical images, architectural plans, and an interview with librarian Mary Lewis from the State Library of Victoria. I've had a look at the guidelines for adding external links and thought that a link to CV would be relevant and appropriate. Please let me know what you think.--Eleworth (talk) 05:21, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Done -- Zsero (talk) 15:37, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why is the infobox roll-your-own?[edit]

Why doesn't this just use a ready-made template such as Template:Infobox UK cathedral? Is there something UK-specific about that template that makes it unsuitable? And if so is there no similar one that can be used, just to standardise things? -- Zsero (talk) 15:37, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on St Paul's Cathedral, Melbourne. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:17, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]