Talk:St. Anne's Church, Moxi

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 22:39, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Side view of the church
Side view of the church
  • Reviewed:
Created by Uriel1022 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

Uriel1022 (talk) 05:45, 11 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • New enough, long enough, very well-sourced, copy-right compliant (Earwig 7.4%), very presentable. Hook is interesting. Images are properly licensed. No QPQ necessary. Foreign sources AGF. (I put some further comment on the talk page; they're not related to the DYK criteria, but may be helpful.) Cheers, --The Lonely Pather (talk) 19:35, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A thought[edit]

This is very much personal and not obligatory at all, but perhaps this article could use fewer quotes. MOS:QUOTE says Brief quotations of copyrighted text may be used to illustrate a point, establish context, or attribute a point of view or idea. While quotations are an indispensable part of Wikipedia, try not to overuse them. I am not a big fan of having a major body paragraph ("According to the Valencian Franciscan ... ") mostly in quotes. WP:Encyclopedic style would mean using reducing quotes and details if need be, I think. Excellent article overall! Cheers, --The Lonely Pather (talk) 19:38, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the suggestion which additionally demonstrates your familiarity with the rules, excellent job, TLP. I'll leave it for tomorrow. Uriel1022 (talk) 00:54, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]