Talk:Sports Car GT

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Fair use rationale for Image:Sports Car GT Logo.JPG[edit]

Image:Sports Car GT Logo.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 05:07, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Useless info?[edit]

"A large community of editors has formed around SCGT, although it was never as large as that of Grand Prix Legends."

Is there any reason why it should be compared to the community of Grand Prix Legends? And anyway, I don't think there is a reliable source for that "fact" either. I think "although it was never as large as that of Grand Prix Legends" should be removed. Thoughts?  Wes R.  T  —Preceding undated comment was added at 17:12, 17 September 2008 (UTC).[reply]

Actually, after further reading the article, I'd say the above problem I mentioned is the least of this article's problems.--Wes Richards (talk) 17:20, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Two different platforms[edit]

Please do point out in the re-written article that the two games by different developers for Microsoft Windows and PlayStation were received differently by critics, with the PC version being significantly better. For example, GameSpot, 8.2 vs 3.8. Currently the article only describes the PSX version in unnecessary detail.

-- J7n (talk) 20:50, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Source[edit]