Talk:Spider-Man: Big Time

Scope of the article

I originally started the article to only cover The Amazing Spider-Man #648-654 and then I expanded it to #648-656 because that seemed more appropriate. Technically all of the issues that have come out after #656 are still part of "Big Time," but I did not include them as I thought it would be best to limit the scope of this article (similar to the Spider-Man: Brand New Day article) so it didn't get too confusing to readers unfamiliar with the story. However, as this recent edit shows, the comic book news media does still refer to the later issues as "Big Time" issues. Obviously we can reduce the number of reprinted issues in the Wikipedia article without having to change the reference, but it did make me realize that a discussion is necessary so everyone can agree on the scope of this article to avoid future disputes. I support limiting the scope to The Amazing Spider-Man #648-656. Spidey104 20:08, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

Hi, Spidey. It's always good to work with you, and I very much applaud your soliciting input. I'm probably not the best person to comment on this particular article, since I'm not a fan of fictographic entries. Without real-world discussion by creators, etc., they seem very oriented toward fans and not general-public readers. The reception section here is a good step toward real-world discussion, though if I were editing this article (which I'm afraid I probably won't be), I would follow the WP:FILM method of quoting select critics in context — giving the why behind the opinions and not simply a number rating or the like. I hope these observations help in some way. With regards, --Tenebrae (talk) 02:37, 25 June 2011 (UTC)

Since there have been no dissenting opinions this article will be maintained at the scope I previously stated to keep it a concise and well-written article. Further storylines can be made into their own articles if they meet notability requirements. Spidey104 06:57, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Spider-Man: Big Time. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110811014829/http://www.comicsalliance.com/2010/07/25/spider-man-big-time to http://www.comicsalliance.com/2010/07/25/spider-man-big-time/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:24, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Spider-Man: Big Time. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/69v6IHYF0?url=http://marvel.com/comic_books/issue/39603/amazing_spider-man_big_time_2011_1 to http://marvel.com/comic_books/issue/39603/amazing_spider-man_big_time_2011_1

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:09, 21 January 2018 (UTC)