Talk:Speyside single malt

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Food and Drink task list:

To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:

Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt
Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar
Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish
Participate in project-related deletion discussions.
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food
Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section

Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

Spirits Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spirits, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spirits or Distilled beverages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpiritsWikipedia:WikiProject SpiritsTemplate:WikiProject SpiritsSpirits articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Spirits WikiProject task list:

This list is transcluded from the tasks page, to edit it click here.

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Spirits:

Tagging all articles that fall under our scope with {{WikiProject Spirits}} and assessing their quality and importance to the project.

Scotland Low‑importance

	Scotland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

What about Craigellachie, would this one belong in this list? Abrax5]] | [[User talk:Abrax5|Talk (talk) 23:30, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The map used to show the Speyside region is incorrect. See the Scotch Whisky Association, Whisky Region page and the wikipeda page of the river Spey. Please correct! QV (talk) 12:31, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted every word of new content??[edit]

Reverted good faith edits by Peter K Burian (talk): Copyright issue re https://www.visitscotland.com/see-do/food-drink/whisky/distilleries/speyside/ (TW)

@User:Sphilbrick Insights would be appreciated here. What was the Copyright issue? And did that mean that every word of the new content needed to be deleted?

e.g. The Malt Whiskey Trail section was supported by a BBC citation. And the map was from Wiki Commons. Why was that not acceptable?

Many wikipedia articles use block quotes; when I have done so in the past, I have NOT found that administrators consider the content as a copyright violation. Why is it a violation here?

Peter K Burian (talk) 15:12, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Peter K Burian, It is standard practice, when identifying an edit with a clear copyright violation, to undo using rollback, which reverts all consecutive edits by the same author. That sometimes also undoes perfectly fine edits, but it sometimes picks up other problematic edits. I can send you the relevant material, but not right away, because I have to head to the hospital shortly. S Philbrick (Talk) 19:41, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, @User:Sphilbrick please, do send the material; some of it is very useful. This article has so little real information. OK, I won't do block quotes this time. Cheers, Peter K Burian (talk) 20:05, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Peter K Burian, To be honest, I missed that you were using blockquotes. That makes it technically not a copyright issue, but that text is clearly promotional. I don't see any value in restoring it as not a copyvio, then removing it as spam. S Philbrick (Talk) 23:18, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Peter K Burian, I changed my mind. While I think the edit is very problematic, I'm single focused on copyright issues at the moment, so will leave it for others. S Philbrick (Talk) 23:25, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

OK, @User:Sphilbrick, I have done a final revision; I reduced significantly the quotes from Visit Scotland; I felt that the block quotes were fine, but perhaps not. The current version of the article should be perfectly acceptable re: Copyright. Peter K Burian (talk) 00:56, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Peter K Burian, Thanks. S Philbrick (Talk) 12:35, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]