Talk:Spencer Ackerman

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Spencer Ackerman article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 730 days

Daily pageviews of this article

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.

Blogging (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Blogging, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.BloggingWikipedia:WikiProject BloggingTemplate:WikiProject BloggingBlogging articles

Journalism Low‑importance

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

COI tag (August 2021)[edit]

Unaddressed COI from WP:SPA Loksmythe (talk) 13:47, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Loksmythe, is there something beyond what you addressed with the editor on their talk page? Innisfree987 (talk) 14:57, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Innisfree987, WP:DUCK in my opinion. WP:SPA engaged in WP:PROMO who clearly has previous editing experience. Loksmythe (talk) 01:39, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Loksmythe, for me the thing is you asked and got an answer. I sort of think, if you feel it’s past what you can accept AGF, it belongs at WP:COIN to get a consensus on how to handle. Here it seems just reiterating concerns already asked and answered. Innisfree987 (talk) 02:58, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tag still appropriate IMO. This article is really heavy on the primary sourced promotion - David Gerard (talk) 12:57, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah I agree now: the issues were not addressed unfortunately. Innisfree987 (talk) 17:27, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If anyone else has time to pitch in cutting it back, I’d be grateful. It was 112kb when I started and it’s down by half but still far too detailed. Fresh eyes would be very welcome. Innisfree987 (talk) 21:38, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]