Talk:Speed limiter

class=Draft, because oldid 1101405781 was deleted importance=High, obviously, because of existing systems and existing system regulations.

Article created by split[edit]

The text for this article was created by this edit from Governor (device). PeterEastern (talk) 01:13, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Shouldn't the link to Jaguar should point to the car manufacturer, not the animal 72.37.171.28 (talk) 16:43, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Title[edit]

Shouldn't the title be something like 'Vehicle speed limiter'? --flying idiot 03:57, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I agree.

Why that reference to UK on two different sections? The article clearly speaks about these limits in a number of places. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dante Matsui (talk • contribs) 02:51, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes for Vehicle speed limiter as a title
Yes, reference to the UK is inadequate; is should rather be EU, Northern Ireland and Great-Britain
- Those things are regulated at a wider level: international conventions, UNECE and European union for instance.
- Mopeds, heavy-vehicle speed limiters and ISA concepts are not limited to Great-Britain and/or United-Kingdom. Their geographical perimeter is at least the EU, EFTA, Northern Ireland (as long as vehicles cross land border) and Great-Britain (as long as UK remains aligned on the EU law) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:8425:642:D701:BF55:9F65:2A1C:85EB (talk) 11:22, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Speed limiter. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20101011130324/http://www.dft.gov.uk:80/adobepdf/162469/221412/221549/227755/rrcgb2008.pdf to http://www.dft.gov.uk/adobepdf/162469/221412/221549/227755/rrcgb2008.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 18:25, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Suggested improvement[edit]

I propose this improvement:

1 History
2 Statutory static speed limit
2.1 Mopeds
2.2 Heavy vehicles (European union)
2.3 Static speed limit in European nations
2.3.1 E scooter
2.3.2 Pedelec
2.4 Statutory (UK)
2.4.1 Mopeds
2.4.2 Public service vehicles
2.4.3 Heavy goods vehicles
3 Non-statutory (UK)
3.1 Dynamic (ISA)
3.2 Programmable
3.3 Fixed brand speed limiter
3.4 Unsourced speed limiter
4 See also
5 Notes
6 References

See old id 11 01 40 57 81 URL for references. 2A02:8425:642:D701:BF55:9F65:2A1C:85EB (talk) 21:37, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]