Talk:Speckle imaging

Astronomy Mid‑importance

	Astronomy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biology Mid‑importance

	Biology portal Speckle imaging is part of the WikiProject Biology, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to biology on Wikipedia. Leave messages on the WikiProject talk page.BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject BiologyTemplate:WikiProject BiologyBiology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Systems Mid‑importance

	Systems science portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Systems, which collaborates on articles related to systems and systems science.SystemsWikipedia:WikiProject SystemsTemplate:WikiProject SystemsSystems articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is within the field of Visualization.

Technology

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles

tone warning[edit]

I removed the tone warning of User:TheOtherSiguy, which seems unmerited. It is also unhelpful to have such a warning without an explanation of what is being objected to, which should be added on this discussion page. Will leave a note on this user's page.Puzl bustr (talk) 13:27, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This article is focussing on a very limited aspect of speckle imaging. Much more importance this has in optical metrology / reverse engineering / non destructive testing.

Speckle images are used for systems to retrieve 3D data from objects, to detect movements, deformations, defects. Used in sytems for Electronic specle pattern imageing, Speckle photographic methods, Shearography, etc.

The article should be edited in the way that it leads also to major applications used in industry, and real life. Astronomy is only a very small scientiffic playground compared to industry. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.124.114.42 (talk) 16:55, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not Video Astronomy[edit]

Video Astronomy is not really the same thing as speckle imaging. It uses real-time stacking to improve the signal to noise ration of images in real time but isn't really trying to specifically address speckle issues. It's also distinct from lucky imaging as all images are used.

It is a burgeoning and increasingly sophisticated aspect of amateur astronomy that people like me are trying to find out more information about - I propose that a specific video astronomy topic needs to be reinstated. Stub Mandrel (talk) 19:24, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I second this clarification. Video-Astrophotography - another name for Video Astronomy - has been around in it's own right since the 1970's in it's first tentative steps. Today we have highly sophisticated cameras, both analog and digital, with which to engage in this craft. Often recognized as both a science and art-form with room for many variations under a larger umbrella of a form of astrophotography.

Stay tuned for an upcoming major article on this subject. It is surprising to find it's lacking at this late date.

Dave In Vermont 24.09.15

Example Images[edit]

The example images are said in the text NOT to be from speckle imaging, but instead from a a different technique. As such, it raises the question of why these images are in the article at all. I am thus going to delete them.

Michael in California — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.55.54.40 (talk) 22:26, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Who?[edit]

Bold textWho developed speckle imaging? I don't know, so can someone make a part about that? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 187.216.73.110 (talk) 15:28, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]