Talk:South Jordan, Utah

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleSouth Jordan, Utah has been listed as one of the Geography and places good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 29, 2010Peer reviewReviewed
April 7, 2010Good article nomineeListed
April 27, 2010Featured article candidateNot promoted
Current status: Good article

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:South Jordan, Utah/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

This is a very well-presented article on a city. It covers pretty much everything that one would expect in a city article: history, geography, demographics, attractions, notable residents, etc. All of the sources look fine, and I see no issues with original research or low source quality. I don't see any fact that's unsourced, nor do I see any issue with the prose. The intro is long enough; the pictures and graphs are appropriately captioned, credited and licensed; there are no content disputes; no bias; no important information that's missing. "Notable Natives" is fine as a list, since it's a short list and changing it to prose would only make for a super-short section. Overall, I see absolutely no reason not to pass this article. Very good work all around. Reviewer: Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many ottersOne batOne hammer) 03:49, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Too much of the County and less of the city[edit]

Quite a portion of the page is better suited to be included in Salt Lake County, Utah, rather than South Jordan, Utah. Any way to move this portion off South Jordan, Utah page? Samuelsenwd (talk) 19:27, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on South Jordan, Utah. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:36, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]