This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed
Overall very well written. I have some small comments:
Use the parameter |via=Google Books for sources retrieved from Google Books
Include the original artists of the covers where possible.
That's all :) Ippantekina (talk) 16:37, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Thank you for taking on the review and providing your feedback Ippantekina. I have actioned your comments and changes have been applied to the article. Let me know if there's anything I may have missed. Pseud 14 (talk) 17:57, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by CSJJ104 (talk) 13:35, 8 October 2022 (UTC)