Talk:Songbird Sings/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Songbird Sings/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Ippantekina (talk · contribs) 12:44, 7 September 2022 (UTC)


Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Overall very well written. I have some small comments:

  • Use the parameter |via=Google Books for sources retrieved from Google Books
  • Include the original artists of the covers where possible.

That's all :) Ippantekina (talk) 16:37, 11 September 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for taking on the review and providing your feedback Ippantekina. I have actioned your comments and changes have been applied to the article. Let me know if there's anything I may have missed. Pseud 14 (talk) 17:57, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Passing-- Ippantekina (talk) 01:50, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by CSJJ104 (talk) 13:35, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

Improved to Good Article status by Pseud 14 (talk). Self-nominated at 20:43, 12 September 2022 (UTC).

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.
Overall: Overall, meets all criteria for DYK, no reason I can see to not approve this hook. JJonahJackalope (talk) 21:44, 15 September 2022 (UTC)