Talk:Society of Communist Czechoslovakia

	Socialism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Czech Republic Low‑importance

	Czech Republic portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Czech Republic, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Czech Republic on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Czech RepublicWikipedia:WikiProject Czech RepublicTemplate:WikiProject Czech RepublicCzech Republic articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Not communist[edit]

This wrong use of terms should be cleaned up in wikipedia. Czechoslovakia was never communist, never proclaimed to be communist neither. References to American books are irrelevant, because they use the wrong terms as well and each other American author continued to use wrong terminology. I request the removal of calling socialist countries communist! RedStar1987

They were "communist" as they were controlled by a party that called itself communist. There was not a communism in any country in history so the term "communism" used in any other way than theological is wrong, but the term "communist" is correct.--The Dominator (talk) 17:50, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Society of Communist Czechoslovakia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090106133812/http://www.osaarchivum.org/db/fa/300-30.htm to http://www.osaarchivum.org/db/fa/300-30.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:13, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Too long[edit]

This article is too long. More pictures, please. Kapeter77 (talk) 04:15, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Lack of sources[edit]

The whole page stems from only one or two sources which is clearly not enough for a page like this. Moreover, it seems this page doesn't quote them enough and its tone sometimes isn't as much wikipedian as it could be. --96.22.228.193 (talk) 03:25, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]