This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Toys, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of toys on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ToysWikipedia:WikiProject ToysTemplate:WikiProject ToysToys articles
To respond to those who said that this article contained material of dubious accuracy. All of this is verifiable and I have added a reference to an academically peer reviewed book that supports the statements made here. Perhaps some of you guys (i.e. males) out there don't know enough about dolls to judge the accuracy of an article
Bebe Jumeau 16:07, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
OK first, please try to be civil; second, please assume good faith. We are all trying to work to build a better encyclopedia and the only way to do that is keep our cool. Belittling those who are trying to help you is not the way to proceed. The accuracy of the article can only be judged by the sources that are provided to support it. If you can provide more, it will only help improve the article. If you need help, please ask for it either on the help desk, on the talk pagesw of other editors (me included), or by adding the {{helpme}} template to your talk page. Hope this helps. – ukexpat (talk) 19:05, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
