Talk:Smoke Gets in Your Eyes (Mad Men)
 | Smoke Gets in Your Eyes (Mad Men) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
 | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
GA Review[edit]
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Smoke Gets in Your Eyes (Mad Men)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Gen. Quon (talk · contribs) 04:35, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
Infobox: Just checking; any production number of Guest Stars that could be put in the box?Lede: Link AMCLede: "…the viewer doesn't learn…" Don't use contractionsLede: "…some of her coworkers . Junior…" Remove the space before the periodLede: "…interest for Mad Men didn't…" Don't use 'didn't' -> "did not"Plot: "having an Old Fashioned at a bar" What is this? Maybe a link would helpPlot: "enter into the premises" I would say "onto" instead of "into"Conception: "Weiner's agents insisted he not" -> "Weiner's agents insisted that he not"- Conception: In the lede it states that the show was on hold for eight years, but in this section is says "next seven years"
Conception: "Movies were an influence [...]." -> "Movies were an influence".Conception: Link AMC the first time it appearsReferences: Add "Academy of Television Arts & Sciences" as publisher for the emmys.com citesReferences: Ref 35 has a funny bracket issue- References: Some newspapers have their owners in parenthesis (like 23) and others are just listed after the paper (like 26, 27, etc.) I'd pick one style to be consistent
On hold for seven days.--Gen. Quon (talk) 18:38, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
- I wasn't the nominator of this article, but I happened to stumble by, and most of the these were pretty quick fixes. The two not struck out are the ones I didn't deal with, as I thought it'd be better for the nominator to work on those. Drovethrughosts (talk) 22:04, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
External links modified[edit]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Smoke Gets in Your Eyes (Mad Men). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120614013739/http://www.elle.com/Pop-Culture/Celebrity-Spotlight/Jon-Hamm3 to http://www.elle.com/Pop-Culture/Celebrity-Spotlight/Jon-Hamm3
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130607160139/http://www.mpse.org/goldenreels/2008awards/2008tvnominees.html to http://www.mpse.org/goldenreels/2008awards/2008tvnominees.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:40, 19 June 2017 (UTC)