Talk:Six Flags Hurricane Harbor

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

I'm not even a Wikipedia member, let alone an admin, but I think it should be clear to anyone that this page requires definite cleanup. Would someone please flag this page and/or get rid of it? There is little factual information here and a lot of speculation--particularly the part about people peeing in the water. 24.27.105.150 (talk) 07:43, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

pictures[edit]

on tuesday im going to be taking pictures of the park's atractions (slides, fast food, merchandise). if anyone has any special requests please tell me by the night before. the pictures are all done by my work that i will be donating to wikipedia commons —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nrpf22pr (talkcontribs) 03:16, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

heather is amazing —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.235.187.20 (talk) 14:39, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

New Hurricane Harbor in Morelos, Mexico/Edit Request 2/28/2016[edit]

According to the Six Flags article and the Six Flags official website, on February 2, 2016. Six Flags was confirmed to have acquired a water park in Morelos, Mexico. It will be called Six Flags Hurricane Harbor Oaxtepec. It was originally called Parque Acuatico Oaxtepec, which was a 76-acre water park that went bankrupt in 2011. Could someone please add info regarding Six Flags Hurricane Harbor Oaxtepec to the Hurricane Harbor article? --75.68.122.13 (talk) 19:20, 28 February 2016 (UTC)Jacob Chesley the Alternate Historian[reply]

WP:TNT this article[edit]

I am planning on WP:TNTing this article soon, as there are problems that need to be addressed:

  1. [Lack of] History - There are no further updates past 2006 about the chain itself, and each individual park section does not have general park information/history.
  2. Rebranded water parks - As far as I can tell, there's no consensus about separate admission/property water parks that have been rebranded that have articles and whether or not to have attraction lists for them.
  3. Inclusion of an attraction list for each park - The attraction lists are lengthy and most likely have WP:OR within them, they make up basically most of the article.

If anyone has any more ideas on how to better organize/write this article, it would be greatly appreciated. Thanks! --Harobouri🎢🏗️ (he/him) 19:09, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Harobouri: Yes it looks like the article has accumulated some WP:OR and other junk details over time and could use a serious makeover. I doubt many are actively watching this page, so feel free to do what you think is best. One statistic I noticed off the bat that can be removed is "Height requirements". Wikipedia is not a travel guide, and years ago discussion concluded that height requirements are not something we should be tracking or documenting in an encyclopedia. Descriptions and historical facts should be kept to a minimum and tied to strong sources. You could put a cleanup message at the top like this one for a few weeks, and if no one responds, start nuking uncited details.
One example you could look at is Soak City (Kings Island), although it has been a while since I've taken a close look at that article. It may have fallen into disrepair as well. --GoneIn60 (talk) 19:17, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]