Talk:Sittingbourne and Kemsley Light Railway

Trains: in UK Low‑importance

	Trains Portal
DYK	May 28, 2019

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Low-importance).

Kent B‑class Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Kent, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the county of Kent in South East England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.KentWikipedia:WikiProject KentTemplate:WikiProject KentKent-related articles

B

This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Kent tasks:

Here are some Kent related tasks you can do:

Clean up an article: Here are automatically generated lists of articles needing cleanup sorted alphabetically and by category.
Edit the Top and High importance articles.
Refine/polish: Ashford, Royal Tunbridge Wells, Canterbury
Expand:: List of churches in Kent, Maidstone Borough Council
NPOV: K College
Citation needed: Unreferenced Kent articles
Cleanup/Copyedit: Kingdom of Kent
Expert attention: Channel Tunnel, Bromley Civic Society
Stubs: see Kent geography stubs articles

Note: These articles may overlap with those on other related lists. If you would like to make a change, either do so yourself, or make a suggestion.

The route diagram template for this article can be found in Template:Bowaters line.

Ampersand in official name[edit]

For some reason User:Duncharris changed the article name to have "and" instead of "&", the ampersand. However, it looks to me like it should in fact be "&" as it was originally - see the company's website. Duncharris, who appears to no longer contribute to Wikipedia, changed many article names in the same way (see Special:Contributions/Duncharris), and some have been changed back again. Does anybody object if I change this article's name back again (to show the "&")? If nobody objects in the next week or so, I'll go ahead and reinstate the "&". A bit iffy 01:51, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

While not wishing to speak ill of the dearly departed, Mr. Harris in this case as in many others he was wrong and imposed his personal view on Wikipedia, even though it was against policy. I have gone ahead and moved the article to its correct title. Gwernol 02:29, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for taking on the responsibility there, Gwernol - I was treading a bit carefully as I could see this sort of change had been a bit sensitive. Cheers, A bit iffy 16:47, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fact box[edit]

Please can someone alter the length of the Railway - it is around 2 miles long.

Also, I've added a few bits of text and stuff but how do I go about adding photos and descriptions of the rolling stock?

Thanks,

Paul Best Press Officer, Sittingbourne & Kemsley Light Railway

Update needed[edit]

The article needs to be updated. Some things that are now in the past are referred to in the future tense, and some events don't have the year included in the date. --Zabdiel (talk) 09:36, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done Mjroots (talk) 13:17, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Good work! --Zabdiel (talk) 16:07, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sittingbourne Viaduct[edit]

This article repeatedly states the notability of Sittingbourne Viaduct, but no pictures of this are included. Perhaps a picture of the viaduct should be included? (Possibly even as the lead photograph to give better context). —Sladen (talk) 09:31, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It's not exactly the most photogenic viaduct in the world. The best I could find is this ([1]) on the Geograph website, and I really don't think it's a candidate to replace the infobox image we have at present. The article is, after all, about the railway, not about the viaduct.

Unfortunately, the Geograph2Commons tool isn't working at the moment, so I was unable to upload this particular image. There is another image of the viaduct already at Wikimedia Commons ([2]), but I'm not sure it's worth using. Skinsmoke (talk) 10:40, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Sittingbourne and Kemsley Light Railway. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110504202023/http://www.sklr.net/index.htm to http://www.sklr.net/index.htm
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://photos.stopem.net/p53013502.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:24, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Milton Regis halt[edit]

on the diagram (not the picture) of the route, it clearly shows that Milton Regis Halt is open. just to clarify as a volunteer here, the halt closed in 2014 and hasn't reopened since nor are there any plans to. could someone please fix this as I'm not good at editing on Wikipedia 86.27.17.247 (talk) 14:32, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]