Talk:Sipah-e-Sahaba

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Request for expansion[edit]

It would be useful to include information on how it differs from its previous guise, why it changed/split, and what they do. -- Ratarsed 12:43, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bias[edit]

This article seems very biased. There are no historical fact, links or referenced. It seems that the writer is hurling his anger at Sipah-e-Sahaba. A Wahabi sect...related to Kharjites...They have killed many people....what a...and then related to al-qaeda....man have some sense. A TOTALLY BIASED ARTICLE! Mrizwankhan 09:26, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]


I object to the following phrases:

1 "savage extremism"
2 "debauche seikhdoms of Arabs"
3 "enlightened sects of Islam"
4 "a savage and extreme culture of violence and defamation of Islam"
5 "part of a strong anti-islam plot"

Descendall 05:16, 14 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Updated[edit]

I changed a bit to take out some of the bias, as well as generalizations that didn't reference historical backing in the article.

Copyright problem removed[edit]

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. CactusWriter | needles 14:42, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Correction on SSP[edit]

HowieNDC 15:33, 21 March 2007 (UTC)SSP is not Deobandi, not Wahabi orginazation, SSP is all over muslim orgization, the member of this orginazation belongs to Deobandi,Brelvi,ahle hadis, hanbali as well as all muslim groups. -- — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dr.Sajid Hussain (talkcontribs) [reply]

Removed uncited content 2018[edit]

This content was uncited for 5 years, so I have removed it, and it should be properly formatted and cited if it is to be restored. MatthewVanitas (talk) 11:18, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


and the workers of the Sipah-e-Sahaba took place at Bhakkar which is situated in the west of the Punjab, Pakistan. At least 4 Shiite Muslims and 7 SSP have been killed and a dozen have been injured after the workers of the Sipah-e-Sahaba clashed with the local Shiite Muslims on August 23, 2013.

The clashes between the banned Sipah-e-Sahaba and Shiite Muslims happened in the town of Kotla Jam and Darya Khan.

The conflict followed a protest rally held by the banned Sipah-e-Sahaba, where the militants of the banned outfit were chanting slogans against Shiite Muslims.

They were identified as Safdar Shah and Imran Shirazi of Darya Khan and Ali Raza, Khan Muhammad and Kamran Mohana of Kotla Jam townships.

The affected area’s residents rejected the media reports that it was a clash between two religious groups. They warned the media persons to desist from equating peaceful residents with the sectarian and fanatic terrorists. They said it was an armed and provocative attack on peaceful population. They said that self-defense was their legal right that they opted for.

The victims’ families and friends have gathered at Hussaini Chowk roundabout of Bhakkar district to protest against the attack on their houses and unarmed people.

After the situation, the Majlis Wahdat-e-Muslimeen, Shia Ulema Council, Imamia Students Organization condemned the clashes and have declared three days of mourning. Also, the then Chief Minister of the Punjab Shahbaz Sharif took notice of the situation, saying those who had broken the law will be dealt severely following the arrests of the terrorists belonging to the defunct organisation.

Possible new name "Sunni Rabita Committee"[edit]

Per news reports, ASWJ may be operating under a new name to evade proscription: Sunni Rabita Committee. News reporting is reliable but minor so far, but might be worth occasional checks to see if the name is indeed ASWJ itself, and if it gains ground. MatthewVanitas (talk) 17:22, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 12:01, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 20:09, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No list of potential attacks and activities[edit]

Add a list of SSP's involvement in violence against shia community of Pakistan. Sipah e Sahaba is involved in a dozes of terrorist attacks, yet the article doesn't even cites a single one. 175.107.224.141 (talk) 16:46, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 20:23, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]