Talk:Single-pair high-speed digital subscriber line

The contents was previously under the title Symmetric High-speed Digital Subscriber Line. But the correct title according to ITU-T is Single-Pair High-speed Digital Subscriber Line. I created this page and copied the data under the previous title in it, and redirected the old title to the new one.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Reza mirhosseini (talk • contribs) 07:01, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There is a page at: Symmetric digital subscriber line which has a link to G.SHDSL which redirects here. WHAT???? Someone who knows please change, so I can know, too.60.240.207.146 (talk) 11:46, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Symmetric digital subscriber line explains the sometimes use of SDSL as an umbrella term for various symmetric DSL technologies, of which includes G.SHDSL (hence it is referenced there). The main confusion is from the ITU-T terminology used for the "S" in SHDSL. ADSL being referred to here as the "opposite" of SHDSL is the main issue, therefore leading most to beleive the "S" should stand for symmetric, being the "opposite" of asymmetric. The "S" officially stands for "single-pair" as the previous HDSL technology had specifications for using up to three pairs. However, to confuse matters even more, SHDSL does have the option of using two pairs for greater distance (or more accurately higher reliability of a given speed over the distance). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.38.78.228 (talk) 03:32, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

SHDSL not implies single pair, the description is wrong. S = symmetric —Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.49.162.248 (talk) 18:45, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The standard (ITU-T G.991.2) calls it Single-pair high-speed digital subscriber line. Are you implying the standard is wrong? What a odd thing to do. It appears to me that the latest 2 edits are nonsense and should be undone. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Easyb (talk • contribs) 10:47, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]