Talk:Sikorsky CH-54 Tarhe

S-64 civil split

I have split the information on the civil version of the S-64 from the CH-54 Tarhe page to the "Erickson S-64" page, which I then renamed S-64 Skycrane. The Erickson article was very skimpy in its coverage. I felt it would be better to cover the civil versions of the S-64 on one page than to have them split between two pages. I have also created the Erickson Air-Crane article to cover the company itself, tho at this point it is mostly a copy of the "Erickson S-64" page from before the merger. All 3 articles still need reworking and expansion, especially the company page. - BillCJ 19:39, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

Payload

I'm confused: The Article says 9 tons – but shows a picture of a Tarhe lifting a Sheridan tank, which according to the Sheridan Article weighs over 15 tons. What's up with that? --BjKa (talk) 23:41, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

This is likely a lightened M551 to around the 14 ton or less weight. Later versions of S-64s/CH-54s could use four points to carry from 10 tons up to 12.5 tons. So I was told. I don't see the one local ex-CH-54 pilot I know, but you could ask Erickson. 143.232.210.150 (talk) 22:43, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

In the movie Apocalypse now it is even depicted an Huey that holds a patrol vessel, but it's frankly impossible, as those boats weighted around 18,000 lb (!!!) Strange, really. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.11.0.22 (talk) 12:32, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

A lot of Sheridans ended their days as gunnery targets, that one may well not have an engine in it. The boat being lifted in Apocalyse Now is probably a fibreglass replica of their real one, most likely because they were worried about damaging the real one: they might not even have realised that the Huey couldn't possibly have lifted the boat if it was real. Bones Jones (talk) 21:40, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

The PBR was written to be lifted in by a Chinook. But there was a falling out with Donald Rumsfeld, who wanted control of the script before promising any US support (and the US had the Chinooks). So instead, everything was supplied by the Filipino military, as Marcos was easier to flatter than Rumsfeld. This meant a supply of Hueys and Loaches, a shortage of Cobras and no Chinooks. I guess they stripped weight from a hull to do it? Take the armour and the engines out, and that's a lot gone - they're not a heavy hull. No more than a prop mould. Also the Huey was lifting more by those days and they might even have had a twin engine Huey to play with. Andy Dingley (talk) 22:30, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

Good image

DE wikipedia has a good image:

File:Sikorsky Skycrane carrying house bw.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.46.109.233 (talk) 10:00, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Sikorsky CH-54 Tarhe/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Needs organization and copyedit. Facts that don't apply to the aircraft are included. (Born2flie 15:17, 1 October 2006 (UTC))

Last edited at 20:16, 11 June 2010 (UTC). Substituted at 06:09, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Sikorsky CH-54 Tarhe. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080506193500/http://www.redstone.army.mil/history/aviation/factsheets/ch54.html to http://www.redstone.army.mil/history/aviation/factsheets/ch54.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:21, 23 January 2018 (UTC)