Talk:Siamak Rahpeyk
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Notability?.[edit]
- The subject of the article does not meet the WP:notability, both sources mention just date of birth, name and designation of works. Justice007 (talk) 01:38, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
- If you think Seyamal R. Payek does not meet WP Notability then why don't you recommend it for deletion and discussion? You are just upset because I recommended deletion of an article you defended against its deletion and now you are going after articles I contributed to and attack them in retaliation with frivilous lack of notability claims. I am not even going to explain to you the aticle you attacked, because I believe your intentions are not honorable.--Juristicweb (talk) 03:24, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
- Hi Juristicweb, I do not think that my edits fall under WP:harassment or WP:Wikihounding, I always assume WP:good faith. I try to improve and expand the articles, I am not here to nominate articles for deletion. As the question of tagging your created article Seyamak R. Payek, is not the result of your comment at deletion discussion Nandini Sahu at all. I do not bother if any article is being deleted according to polices, but I try to search the reliable sources to save the articles, if not then not, that are not my worries.
I searched also reliable sources for your created article but did not find, when I come across an article that has not sources to establish the notablity, I can not leave it without proper tagging, this will be unfairness. Please do not think that my action is based on any kind of bad faith. I will help you to improve your other articles too, that are poor in formating and needed WP:wikified. Be happy to edit everywhere at wikipedia, there are no specific instructions for that. Cheers. Justice007 (talk) 10:20, 27 August 2012 (UTC)