Talk:Shiva Simha Singh
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Feedback from New Page Review process[edit]
I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Thanks for creating the article!.
✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 12:30, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion[edit]
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 19:10, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
Infobox portrait[edit]
The portrait in the inforbox is fan made art and does not provided encyclopedic value. Posthumous portraits need to have encyclopedic value (please see WP:Portrait) SKAG123 (talk) 05:20, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
- The real contemporary portrait of Shiva Simha is not available otherwise there would have been no issue using such. This one is of high quality as well made by a professional artist from an Instagram post (who seem to have been paid by a user to make that). I've seen it previously lots of video editor using this same art so it's not of any other king.
- Here is the link to that artist's post
- Also, I think WP:Portrait doesn't disallow it completely provided contemporary one is available or the source itself mentions the features which in this case he's mentioned as Roopnarayana meaning handsome and such which is where the portrait is based from. This is still not a newbie work. HistoricPilled (talk) 15:30, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
- Atleast, this is what I found based on my reasearch. Hope it clears and be helpful to the topic. HistoricPilled (talk) 15:33, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
- The portrait does not provide encyclopedic value. It is a completely fictional and imaginary image and does not provide an accurate or realistic depiction of what this figure looks like or how the figure is portrayed.
- other websites using the image is not a reason why it should be in Wikipedia (this is stated in WP:PORTRAIT) The image can be in the body of the article however it is not suitable for the infobox. SKAG123 (talk) 17:12, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
- Alright I'll shift it to the body of the article instead of Portrait. HistoricPilled (talk) 23:28, 8 December 2023 (UTC)