Talk:Shannon, County Clare

Name[edit]

I've added a "meaning" for the Irish place name, but, given the context, "The Old one" looks a bit strange. I guess the town was named after the river (I've commented this out from the bracketed translation for the time being) but wonder was it meant ironically? Nice joke if it was. Anyone know? --sony-youth^pléigh 20:57, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Status[edit]

"Because of its size, the town is managed at a local government level by the Shannon Town Commission, as opposed to a Town Council or Urban District Council."

No, its administered by a Town Council just like every other town with its own local government, see [1]. This was not always the case, for a long time the council had to share authority with SFADCO which had essentially developed the town. [2] for details of the transfer. Neither Town Commissioners or Urban District Councils exist in Irish law any more following the Local Government Act 2001 --Rdd 20:23, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Shannon, County Clare. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:50, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Shannon coat of arms.png

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 09:02, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Shannon coat of arms.png

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:12, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

regarding st pats comp extension[edit]

the extensions construction has been finished since 2018. why does the article still say its due to undergo construction? Vincentmethinks (talk) 13:45, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

When you have independent sources, you can edits the outdated part. The Banner talk 13:57, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

is "i go there" an independent source? Vincentmethinks (talk) 20:18, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No, as sources must also be published, in any form. But Shannon Parish will, in my humble opinion, do. The Banner talk 20:38, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

what about the schools website? Vincentmethinks (talk) 21:51, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That parish website is already on the line. The school website is clearly involved with the school. The Banner talk 22:00, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

but the schools website would still be a viable source for citation that the extension was built, yes? Vincentmethinks (talk) 22:06, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No. The Banner talk 22:22, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

why? Vincentmethinks (talk) 22:28, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Because it is not an independent source. The Banner talk 23:18, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]