A fact from Shaker broom vise appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 5 July 2015 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Did you know... that the flat broom (pictured) was originally made in the Shaker broom vise?
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Agriculture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of agriculture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AgricultureWikipedia:WikiProject AgricultureTemplate:WikiProject AgricultureAgriculture articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horticulture and Gardening, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Horticulture and Gardening on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Horticulture and GardeningWikipedia:WikiProject Horticulture and GardeningTemplate:WikiProject Horticulture and GardeningHorticulture and gardening articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
I think it should be Vise, not vice. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 22:17, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
vise (Brit. vice) >n. a metal tool with movable jaws which are used to hold an object firmly in place while work is done on it.
-DERIVATIVES vise-like >adj.
-ORIGIN ME (denoting a screw or winch): from OFr. vis, from L. vitis 'vine'.
From the Oxford Dictionary
vice1 >n. 1 immoral or wicked behavior. ->criminal activities involving prostitution, pornography, or drugs. ->an immoral or wicked personal characteristic. ->a weakness of character; a bad habit. 2 (also stable vice) a bad or neurotic habit of stabled horses, typically arising as a result of boredom.
-DERIVATIVES viceless >adj.
-ORIGIN ME: via OFr. from L. vitium. I know that this was an American phenomenon, but I feel pretty strongly this is the right way to go. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 22:21, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
You could of course add in "in place of", as in vice president:-). More seriously, I was following the established spelling of the article (WP:ARTCON). If you are certain that US usage is always "vise", which I have seen in some books, go ahead and use it - the article has a string geographic link after all (WP:TIES). It looks weird to English eyes since it doesn't match the pronunciation, but then I'm sure the reverse is also true! Regards, Martin of Sheffield (talk) 22:38, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I also examined vise and vice in
Cambridge American English Dictionary: Definitions ... The former allows you to toggle between British and American English and
Collins American Dictionary | Always Free Online
I am now 100% confident that the article should properly be called "Shaker broom vise." This is consistent with American English. While I am not certain that the article's sources are in line with this, but if they aren't they are wrong. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 01:15, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, agree. I made the move. Thanks for noticing. --Doug Coldwell (talk) 09:32, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I've been a bit wp:bold. First, I don't think a note on vice/vise is needed, this was accepted above and is slightly contentious. This is the wrong place to discuss it. Next, I was concerned that the article was drifting into one about flat brooms, not one about the vises. Finally, there was a bit of duplication and lack of historical narrative. I've hacked things about to keep pre-invention text in the background. I've collected all the description of the invention and its consequences together, and kept the technical description separate - I think it helps readers who are asking "what" rather than "why". I agree with Doug's deletion, the photograph showed a trimmer, not a vise. Martin of Sheffield (talk) 22:48, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
