Talk:Shahzada (Guantanamo Bay detainee 952)

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Afghanistan

	Afghanistan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Afghanistan, a project to maintain and expand Afghanistan-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AfghanistanWikipedia:WikiProject AfghanistanTemplate:WikiProject AfghanistanAfghanistan articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Replaced transcluded image with inline image - {{npov}} tag as per dispute on Template talk:Combatant Status Review Tribunal trailer image and caption[edit]

Replaced transcluded image with inline image - {{npov}} tag as per dispute on Template talk:Combatant Status Review Tribunal trailer image and caption. Geo Swan 12:58, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

clarification please?[edit]

I asked for clarification of the placement of an {{unreferenced}} tag on this article on the talk page of the wikipedian who placed it.

Cheers! Geo Swan (talk) 13:26, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have answered your post on my talk page. What I meant was that the section is filled with statements that take a particular point of view but are not footnoted so the reader does not know where to look to verify whether these statements are true or not, per WP:V and WP:RS. Also, you need unbiased multiple sources for controversial statements. An encyclopedia should not depend on one source for information in an article. I changed the template to, hopefully, more correctly reflect my concerns. Regards, Mattisse 15:03, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

move[edit]

I suggest to move the article to Haji Shahzada. Following the secondary sources ([1], [2]) and others. Haji is unlikely a honorific in the case of this individual. There are no sources or references that say it is an honorific and even if it would be it should be included into name as all sources that i know refers to this individual as Haji Shahzada so that we have to include it according to our policies. IQinn (talk) 13:10, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Shahzada (Guantanamo Bay detainee 952). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:28, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]