Talk:Seyfarth Shaw

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Chicago

	Chicago portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Untitled[edit]

When you look at the List of 100 largest law firms globally, this firm is the only one without links or a description. Why not have a stub and a link to the website? It's more useful than having nothing. You just deleted it too quickly for me to put in any details. NeilKT (talk) 16:43, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, being in the top 100 implies, but does not guarantee, notability. I have removed the speedy tag and encourage you to expand it. This does mean that the article cannot have further debate about it appropriateness on Wikipedia through an article for deletion debate. Jon513 (talk) 18:57, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Could you confirm the citation has been done properly? Not keen to add more content if the citations become too onerous.NeilKT (talk) 19:07, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The article is currently formated fine but it needs to be expanded. You should read Wikipedia:Footnotes to learn how to make footnotes on wikipedia. It is more important to do you best then to worry that you got everything right. Someone can always come along after you and correct any mistakes you make. Also these results at google news for "Seyfarth Shaw" might be helpful in expanding the article. Jon513 (talk) 19:23, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]