Talk:Sexual slavery (BDSM)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Sexual slavery (BDSM) redirect.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Sexology and sexuality Low‑importance

	Human sexuality portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

[edit]

Well hell this page needs some work, I'm going to remove the tags on the basis that I'm going to take this on as a work in progress, and that they say 'see the talk page', but there' obviously wasn't anything here. Restepc (talk) 17:13, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

~~There isn't even a wikipedia page for Dominant/Top/Master/whatever, or submissive, surely there must be some wikipedians with whips in their closet :) Restepc (talk) 14:18, 13 April 2008 (UTC)~~ I'm now working on developing the (previously defunct) Top(BDSM) and Bottom(BDSM) articles into those roles Restepc (talk) 03:04, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fresh Perspective[edit]

Hiya; I'm a regular poster over on Collarme, and live in the LA area. I've been into BDSM for about ten years, and someone over on the collarme message boards mentioned the kink section of Wikipedia might need some work, so I thought I'd pitch in.Stephannn (talk) 22:42, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pictures[edit]

Do we really need two pictures of female slaves for this article? Neither picture gives any more context or information than the other and it seems somewhat gratuitous for so short an article. I suggest we remove one of the pictures or, if we're hellbent on having multiple pictures, make one of the pictures a male slave for parity's sake. 86.13.119.97 (talk) 21:47, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]