Talk:Service switching point

the external link is not valid anymore.

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Not moved. Jafeluv (talk) 10:37, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Service switching point -> Service Switching Point

Per WP:CAPS and WP:TITLE: this is a proper noun referring to a specific and standardized architectural element in an international standard. It does not refer to a general class of switching points for services. — Dgtsyb (talk) 22:53, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. This is not a proper name. The article itself shows that it is indeed a general term for entities of a certain class: "In this new architecture, the telephone exchange is known as an SSP ...".

Neither WP:CAPS nor WP:TITLE gives support to this RM.

Noetica^Tea? 00:58, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Not a proper name, service switching point is just a concept. Stick with the MoS - no need for an exception here. Joja lozzo 02:09, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose—same reasons as elsewhere. This Slippery Slope Will Lead To Just Everything Being Upcased. $Tony (talk)$ 04:34, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. Generic meaning, not a proper noun. Nageh (talk) 23:30, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.