Talk:Sensor (manga)

A fact from Sensor (manga) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 4 January 2022 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Junji Ito had no particular ending in mind while writing Sensor?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2022/January. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Sensor (manga).

Wikipedia

Anime and manga Low‑importance

	Anime and manga portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anime and manga, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of anime, manga, and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anime and mangaWikipedia:WikiProject Anime and mangaTemplate:WikiProject Anime and mangaanime and manga articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 21:56, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that while writing Sensor, Junji Ito didn't have any particular ending in mind and instead followed the characters to progress the story?

Source: GQ interview with Junji Ito

Reviewed: Sangatsu no Phantasia
Comment: I re-wrote this hook multiple times for clarity, but it could probably be improved on further.

Created by Link20XX (talk). Self-nominated at 17:29, 22 December 2021 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: First time DYK reviewing. Article is eligible, looks good, sourcing is clear, could not find any poor references or unsourced statements. ~~Only one problem with the hook, I would advise you to change "just followed" to "followed" because it reads more encyclopedic.~~ Fixed, fine now. RoseCherry64 (talk) 22:50, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review! I have done the requested change. Link20XX (talk) 01:34, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Changed status to passed. RoseCherry64 (talk) 08:56, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Modified ALT0 to T:DYK/P7