Talk:Selsley

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Gloucestershire Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Gloucestershire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Gloucestershire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GloucestershireWikipedia:WikiProject GloucestershireTemplate:WikiProject GloucestershireWikiProject Gloucestershire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

It's true this page is not written from a neutral point of view and sounds like a magazine article, but I think it is so poetically written that whoever wrote it should be notified before it is edited so they can post it somewhere else (e.g. on the Selsley village website). yewtree 20:27, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright?[edit]

Chunks of this article seem to have been lifted from this article which is copyrighted by the author Graham Thomas. Can anybody clarify the matter? If not I will remove offending chunks. Lame Name (talk) 19:57, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Clarification is quite simple. CharlieKingham, who launched this article, is Graham Thomas, so I assume there is not a copyright problem. Alas, this is far from the most egregious example of Graham Thomas using Wikipedia to publicise himself or his work. On 26 December 2006, CharlieKingham put Graham Thomas's birthday into the 1954 article, describing himself as a "leading advertising guru". That survived for a mere three hours. CharlieKingham's talk page shows that he also launched an article plugging a vanity-published book by Graham Thomas. This was eventually found out and deleted. It appears from 211.155.168.68 that CharlieKingham also launched an article about (guess who?) Graham Thomas, which was also found out and deleted. Good work, fellow Wikipedians. Karlsoy (talk) 22:04, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've just reviewed the text sentence by sentence, and I can't see any copyright violations at all. So I removed the template. Apart from that all I did was a bit of cleanup. Minima c (talk) 21:11, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Original research?[edit]

The point raised by Karlsoy above deals with the copyright issue, but turns the article into one of original research, so I have posted a template accordingly. See User talk:Charliekingham for more evidence on this point. PDAWSON3 (talk) 22:38, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Selsley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120606002516/http://www.stroud.gov.uk/docs/planning/planning_strategy.asp to http://www.stroud.gov.uk/docs/planning/planning_strategy.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:16, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Selsley Church.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:45, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]