Talk:Section 15 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Pregnancy and sex discrimination[edit]

The article states "In practice, the enumerated grounds have been given liberal and broad interpretations. For example, discrimination on the basis of pregnancy has been ruled to be sex discrimination (Brooks v. Canada Safeway Ltd.)." However, Brooks was, as the decision itself states, not a Charter case. Although I have no doubt you'd reach the same finding if it were a Charter case, that might be original research; I was wondering if we can find an actual Charter case for this paragraph. CanadianCaesar Et tu, Brute? 02:23, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I believe Brooks is cited as representative of the court's shift to a "purposive" approach to interpretation, which is used in the interpretation of both section 15 and the Human Rights Act. I wouldn't necessarily call it original research as the meaning of a single word will often be used in several contexts. So, for example, the Court's interpretation of words like "sex" in the context of the Human Rights Act will typically be applied in the same way to other texts such as the Charter. However, you're right that the phrase is misleading and suggests that Brooks is a Charter case. A similar Charter case, of course, would be better. None come to mind at the moment, but I'll take look. -PullUpYourSocks 15:09, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Factual Accuracy[edit]

WITH REGARDS TO S.15 ANALYSIS, KAPP IS CURRENTLY THE AUTHORITY AS AFFIRMED BY ERMINESKINE WHICH HAS MOVED AWAY FROM THE LAW TEST AND BACK TOWARDS ANDREWS.


"Meaning and purpose of equality

The concept of equality in Canada has its philosophical origins in the works of Albert Venn Dicey who believed in substantive equality (similar to what Milton Friedman called "equality of outcome"). Substantive equality acknowledges that people do not all have the same ability and attributes, and are not equal under the law. Instead, by treating people differently everyone will be subject to equal impact of the law. This form of equality developed in response to formal equality which applies law indiscriminately and does not differentiates between personal characteristics (often called the "similarly-situated" doctrine)."

I have attempted to verify the information in this paragraph in relation to Dicey. I am concerned that the first sentence is simply false. I have found no evidence that Dicey believes in substantive equality. On the contrary, Dicey's works suggest that he advocated formal equality with respect to the rule of law. I have attached a dubious footnote to this paragraph. A citation, if there is one, is in order. Otherwise, it may be necessary to remove it.Ben 05:51, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Section 15 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:16, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Section_15_of_the_Canadian_Charter_of_Rights_and_Freedoms&oldid=1210292830"