Talk:Second Melbourne ministry
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Second Melbourne ministry article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
.svg){kind=small}
 | The contents of the Second Melbourne Ministry page were merged into Second Melbourne ministry on 13 May 2012. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
| The contents of the Third Melbourne Ministry page were merged into Second Melbourne ministry on 13 May 2012. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
How could Sir Denis Le Marchant have been Parliamentary Secretary to the Treasury? He wasn't an MP at the time. Mackensen (talk) 17:48, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
Proposed merge with 1841 vote of no confidence against the government of Viscount Melbourne[edit]
This episode would be better dealt with as part of the article on the government which it brought down. PamD 23:52, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
- That would make sense. After all, the article is one sentence long, and it doesn't seem as if there is much more relevant info; They voted, the vote was like this, then the prime minister did this thing. Hobbes Novakoff (talk) 15:46, 26 April 2016 (UTC)