Talk:Second Battle of Fredericksburg

Military history: North America / United States / American Civil War B‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

B

This article has been rated as B-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	American Civil War task force

Virginia B‑class Low‑importance

	Virginia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Virginia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Virginia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VirginiaWikipedia:WikiProject VirginiaTemplate:WikiProject VirginiaVirginia articles
B	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It's not mentioned (tho perhaps it should be), here, Irish 24h GA met a Fed Irish rgt, the 69h NY (later 27th "New York" Inf Div). Trekphiler 08:49, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Move?[edit]

Shouldn't this page be renamed to Second Battle of Fredericksburg to be more consistent with the other ACW articles, like the naming of Second Battle of Chattanooga and so on? If there is no objection I'll move it there in a few days. Kresock (talk) 01:37, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done Kresock (talk) 02:22, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And absolutely the correct thing to do. CsikosLo (talk) 18:49, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Changed references[edit]

I added the NPS battle summary and changed the first one, which had been erroneously attributed to the NPS, to the correct source. The link, of course, stayed the same. CsikosLo (talk) 19:07, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Virtually all the ACW article use the expression "National Park Service battle description" because NPS hosts the site and CWSAC is not a defined abbreviation anyone outside our community would recognize. Hal Jespersen (talk) 21:05, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]