Talk:Sea silk

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Sea silk article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Textile Arts Mid‑importance

	Clothing portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Textile Arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of textile arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Textile ArtsWikipedia:WikiProject Textile ArtsTemplate:WikiProject Textile ArtsTextile Arts articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Bivalves Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bivalves, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of bivalves on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BivalvesWikipedia:WikiProject BivalvesTemplate:WikiProject BivalvesBivalves articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

The Veil of Manoppello[edit]

I have removed the reference to, and image of, the Veil of Manoppello as the material cannot be taken out of its glass frame for proper testing, and it is most probably on fine linen (which was often referred to as "byssus" cloth in ancient times). That it might be of Sea silk is only an hypothesis at this point. See: "Properties of byssal threads, the chemical nature of their colors and the Veil of Manoppello" by J.S. Jaworski, IWSAI 2010 - especially in the Conlusions. The paper can be accessed at [1]. Sincerely, John Hill (talk) 18:41, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

BBC News Article[edit]

The UK's BBC News Online have an article about Sea Silk/Byssus and one of the few remaining harvesters and crafters of it (which you can read by clicking on this link) Perhaps it might be referenced in this article?Tarquin Q. Zanzibar (talk) 01:35, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Someone wrote this up at byssus. I'm moving it here:

According to a BBC news article from 2nd September 2015, only a handful of people remain that know how to weave this fabric, and only one who still harvests the raw material required. She is also said to be the only person who can make it shine. The woman in question (Chiara Vigo) does this in the early morning, and is accompanied by the Italian coastguard due to the creature being a protected species. The trade has been in the family for centuries, but she does not make money from the trade; instead giving the fabric to people coming to her wanting help, or tokens for things such as wedding or christening dresses. Up until the Mussolini era there were still a number of women in Italy who were skilled with byssus, says Evangelina Campi, a professor of Italian history and author of La Seta del Mare (The Silk of the Sea). However all attempts to make money from it failed, with "something bad has happened to people who wanted to manufacture byssus on a large scale".^[1]

— kwami (talk) 19:44, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ Paradiso, Max. "Chiara Vigo: The last woman who makes sea silk". BBC. BBC. Retrieved 2 September 2015.

Correcting Pinna squamosa to Pinna nobilis[edit]

I'm going to be WP:BOLD and change the translated quotation from Pinna squamosa to Pinna nobilis as per the World Register of Marine Species accepted synonym status. Warmest Regards, :)—_thecurran Speak your mind ^{my past} 08:27, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sea Silk Gloves[edit]

There's a whole chapter on sea silk in Helen Scale's book "Spirals in Time." She claims that "a pair of women's gloves made from the fabric could fit into half a walnut shell" actually refers to Limerick gloves made from a fine kid that were sold inside walnut shells. Somewhere along the line, there was a bit of a mix-up. The author says there is a museum with gloves made from sea silk (actually, I think it's the one on the main page) but they are hardly "gauzy or dainty." (pg 151-152) Do you think the wording on the front page is strong enough to suggest that this walnut myth is untrue or should more information be added? Ehgarrick (talk) 21:30, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I have had the privilege of handling the glove in the illustration (which is at the Smithsonian in Washington, DC) - but it was years ago and I could not swear that it is, indeed, too bulky to fit into a walnut shell, but it probably is. However, that glove was knitted. Possibly, if the sea silk had been woven first into a fine cloth, and then sewn into a glove, it would have been possible to have been put in a walnut shell as the sea silk fibres are very fine. So, I guess, on balance, I would suggest leaving the reference.

By the way, thanks so much for the mention of Helen Scale's book. I hadn't heard of it before and have just downloaded the Kindle version and am looking forward to reading it. With all best wishes, John Hill (talk) 22:43, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Master of Byssus[edit]

Chiara Vigo is the last master of byssus. She dedicates her life to protect it, together with its delicate environment. She respects its law: it can not be bought or sold. She received by direct transmission the knowledge that goes together with the art of byssus: conservation, dyeing, weaving and hand spinning at 1 micron. Her artworks, at least 100, are famous and hosted by many cities and museums of the world. Sea silk is not an industry, it's a sacred Art, in spite of who would like to profit on it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.37.93.159 (talk) 20:35, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[1] Paradiso, Max. "Chiara Vigo: The last woman who makes sea silk". BBC. BBC. Retrieved 2 September 2015.

[1]