Oppose speedy deletion. Just because this article is a stub does not mean it is not notable. It is adequately sourced, it is not a blog or other personal endeavor and has more than 50,000 hits on a Google test as of May 29, 2007. - Davodd 16:48, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I'm not sure I'd call a link to the site, a press release, and a link to a 3 month old blog entry with 0 comments, adequate sources. I didn't tag it because it was a stub, I tagged it because it didn't assert any notability. I'll remove the speedy and nominate it AfD later today instead, giving the article more time. I tagged it with {{notability}} last week and nobody except a bot seemed to notice. -wizzard2k(C•T•D) 16:56, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This article was nominated for deletion on 2007-05-31. The result of the discussion was redirect.
