Talk:Science Centre Singapore

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Science Centre Singapore article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Singapore Mid‑importance

	Singapore portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Singapore, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Singapore on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SingaporeWikipedia:WikiProject SingaporeTemplate:WikiProject SingaporeSingapore articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Museums Low‑importance

	museums portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Museums, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of museums on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MuseumsWikipedia:WikiProject MuseumsTemplate:WikiProject MuseumsMuseums articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

World-acclaimed[edit]

Instantnood and Novacatz has persisted in attempting to remove the above phrase from this article, with Novacatz calling it a Peacock term. This is despite the fact that a simple google search would have shown that the centre was rated as one of the world's top ten [1]. Is there any evidence to demonstrate otherwise, failing which there is little reason to remove it?--Huaiwei 09:25, 24 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What's wrong with world-acclaimed, since its top 10, can we just leave it to the previous version. --Ter e nc e Ong 11:52, 24 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Is there any third party source showing the ranking? If there's no such evidence we could not rule out the possibility that it might be self-proclaimed. — Insta ntnood 20:16, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A third party source in this case would refer to anyone other than the Singapore Science Centre. Are all sources refering to text only writtern by the SSC? Is the NTUC the SSC, for example? Self-proclaimed? Do you have any valid evidence to support that claim, for which respectable scientific organisation of this stature would call itself one of the world's "top ten best science centre" when Science itself is about proven facts?--Huaiwei 20:52, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Huaiwei and Instantnood Banned[edit]

Blatant and obvious revert warring. Let me try one more time -- edit summaries are not the place for debate that's what this sparsely populated page is for. Revert warring is never acceptable. --Wgfinley 20:15, 24 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]