Talk:Scatternet

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Bad colors[edit]

The colors chosen for the topology illustration (first image) are badly chosen for people with red/green vision deficiency. Please choose reds and greens that are easy to distinguish (contrast, no useless gradients, and more intense colors). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.219.64.64 (talk) 01:53, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


SUggested Merge[edit]

I suggest that this page be merged into either the Bluetooth page or a new Bleutooth networks page with Piconet as I don't think their is really enough detail to warrant its own page and its relavnce is limited to Bluetooth.

Scatternet is not a generic term at all bus applies specifically to Bluetooth and IEEE 802.15 (802.15.1 and 802.15.3. in particular). This article is in serous need of expansion wheter or not it is combined with the Piconet article (which is also in serious need of expansion). - Jpgs 19:12, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bluetooth: "A Bluetooth enabled device that is a member of two or more piconets is said to be involved in a scatternet. Involvement in a scatternet does not necessarily imply any network routing capability or function in the Bluetooth enabled device. The Bluetooth core protocols do not, and are not intended to offer such functionality, which is the responsibility of higher level protocols and is outside the scope of the Bluetooth core specification."

This page imply the opposite since scatternet often is used for this kind of behavious but not necessarily. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.16.21.76 (talk) 09:07, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The first reference link (e.g: http://users.ece.gatech.edu/tommaso/papers/jsac_bluetooth.pdf) does not exist. Should it be removed? (Bhanuvrat (talk) 09:01, 16 October 2011 (UTC))[reply]